Campaigners try again to stop Norway drilling for oil in Arctic
Climate campaigners are taking Norway's government back to court to oppose its plans to open the Arctic for oil drilling despite a public commitment to tackle the environmental crisis.
Climate campaigners are taking Norway's government back to court to oppose its plans to open the Arctic for oil drilling despite a public commitment to tackle the environmental crisis.
The proposed plan would expand offshore drilling to more than 90 percent of waters in the Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf of Mexico, and Arctic. According to the Interior Department, more than 3 billion ...
In the renewed debate over drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, one troubling impact of oil development has been overlooked: Disrupting the annual caribou migration will have a profound …
Drilling for oil in the Arctic is controversial because of the potential environmental risks and the impact on indigenous communities. The Arctic ecosystem is fragile and vulnerable to oil spills, which can have …
One of the new drilling sites would be within the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, a protected wilderness that surrounds the largest lake in Arctic Alaska. The area is a critical habitat for migratory ...
They note that technologies like directional drilling, which allows multiple wells to be drilled outward from one platform, would reduce the overall impact. But environmental groups say that the ...
A court case is under way over whether energy companies can drill for oil and gas in the Arctic. Environmental activists are taking Norway's government to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR ...
Oil drilling in the ANWR would require large amounts of infrastructure, including pipelines, wells, and roads. Clough, Patton, and Christiansen (1987) state that if there was full leasing for oil across the ANWR about 303,000 acres of calving habitat would be affected which is 37% of the total calving habitat (p. 120).
Drilling for Oil in the Arctic: Considering Economic and Social Costs and Benefits. Shell Oil Company has submitted to federal regulators plans to drill four exploratory oil wells in the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea off Alaska. News reports indicate that Shell intends to apply for permits to drill additional wells.
June 1, 2021. WASHINGTON — The Biden administration on Tuesday suspended oil drilling leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, unspooling a signature achievement of the Trump presidency ...
A: The ANWR is made up of arctic and subarctic ecosystems. These ecosystems have severe conditions that the ANWR wildlife is specifically adapted to. For example, most animals have hollow hair follicles and black skin to absorb heat to help keep them warm. 5 The main species that live in the ANWR include black, brown, and polar …
THE THREAT. The Arctic Refuge is at risk of energy development. This process could threaten local wildlife, indigenous cultures, and the global climate. Only 5% of Alaska's wild coastal plain remains protected from development. This unique piece of American coastline is now at risk from drilling that could damage it forever.
The Arctic provides more than $281 billion per year in fishing, oil, mineral extraction, tourism and climate stabilization services, according to a preliminary …
The comments were dated March 13, a day after Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) released leaked internal memos on the scientific "unknowns" of Arctic drilling. PEER said ...
The diminishing sea ice is opening the Arctic Ocean to increased shipping and infrastructure development for oil and gas exploration. Propeller cavitation from shipping, sonar from navy vessels in search of new oil …
Many of the planet's most diverse and ecologically important areas—including the Arctic and Virunga National Park in the Congo Basin—also happen to hold large underground deposits of oil and gas. Extracting these oil and gas deposits can result in lasting damage to the environment. Specifically, oil and gas exploration and development causes …
3. Oil and gas development can ruin wildlands. Infrastructure built for oil and gas extraction can leave behind radical impacts on wildlands. The construction of roads, facilities and drilling sites requires the use of heavy equipment and can destroy big chunks of pristine wilderness. The damage is often irreversible.
Stanford experts explain why the recently approved Willow oil drilling project in Alaska has sparked controversy, discuss the significance of new limits on oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean, and describe the complicated nature of energy transformation in the fastest-warming place on Earth. March 16, 2023. By.
Decades before climate change became a global concern, the U.S. conservation movement geared up to protect Arctic wildlife. In the 1950s, wilderness advocates lobbied for federal action to shield northeastern Alaska from mining and drilling. Momentum to defend the Arctic against … See more
Offshore drilling in the Arctic has long been a contentious issue due to its potential for significant environmental impacts. As the demand for fossil fuels continues to rise, the pristine and delicate Arctic ecosystem faces the risk of …
This monumental decision is a win for the Arctic, Indigenous peoples and the environment. These leases, covering about 365,000 acres, were bought by Alaska's state-owned corporation, the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, during the Trump administration. Safeguarding the Arctic Refuge from oil and gas development …
4) Thus, the Arctic has a potential for hydrocarbon's energy development and hence the problem of affiliated pollution is acute. Scientific research is mostly concerned with the remote sources of Arctic pollution. However, the ongoing oil and gas extraction on the Arctic continental shelf has already had a devastating impact on the ...
Introduction: Understanding the Significance of Drilling in the Arctic The issue of drilling in the Arctic has sparked intense debates surrounding the environmental impact, wildlife conservation, and ecosystem disruption. As concerns about climate change and sustainable practices continue to grow, it is crucial to examine the long-term …
The argument for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is economic. Proponents say it will create jobs, generate $1.1 billion over the next decade, and make the country more energy independent. Alaska's economy depends on the oil industry for one-third of its jobs, but other oil prospects are drying up, according to Alaska's (pro ...
The Arctic contains some of the world's largest untapped oil and gas reserves. However, oil extraction poses a considerable risk to Arctic ecosystems and …
Arctic exploration. "Cost is probably the most important factor, with Statoil estimating that the cost of drilling one oil well in the Arctic could be as much as $500m. This is likely to be prohibitive for most companies in the current climate, with some analysts predicting that the price of crude could drop in the medium term.".
of this drilling in light of the significant changes on both fronts since Arctic drilling was last debated and analyzed. In December 2018, the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for leasing the Coastal Plain for oil and gas drilling. 3. Alaska
Drilling in this ocean could lead to habitat destruction and devastating oil spills—all in an Arctic environment that is slow to recover from damage. Why this place matters The Arctic Ocean is covered in ice most of the year, providing critical habitat to ice-dependent species such as polar bears, seals and walrus.
The report also includes an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Congress continues to study the area but does not open the Coastal Plain to leasing for over three decades. ... Dec. 8, 2020 The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) releases a report finding that pre-drilling seismic surveys in the Arctic Refuge will harass, but not injure or kill ...
While new drilling in U.S. Arctic waters are no longer an immediate risk, without permanent protections, these waters remain vulnerable. Take a look at how a …
Plant Impacts. Oil drilling in Alaska can have disadvantages for plant life. Seismic vibrations can disrupt plants' growth patterns. In addition, the infrastructure from oil drilling can cause drainage issues for plants. Infrastructure, particularly road-building, can also lead to alkaline dust spreading across and settling on topsoil.
SMART NEWS. Massive Arctic Oil Drilling Project Gets the Green Light. The Biden administration approved a controversial proposal for drilling in Alaska, which …
Drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a two part problem. The first issue is. that the actual drilling process where the oil is extracted from the ground is an operation that is. extremely detrimental to any natural environment that is involved.
1. Opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling will mostly benefit global oil companies as the U.S increases net oil exports. The U.S. will be exporting far more oil …
ENVIRONMENT. NEWS. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge just got a reprieve—but it's not safe yet. The U.S. recently announced it would suspend oil and gas …
The environmental case against increased production in the Arctic is clear and irrefutable. Not only does drilling offshore increase the risk of disastrous spills, threatening wildlife, habitats and communities, …
According to a study in Environmental Research, the impacts of the fossil fuel industry on air quality alone cost the United States approximately $77 billion annually—and contribute to hundreds ...